Finland - Global Development
Finland leads the world on SDGs, yet cuts aid 25% by 2027 and struggles with forest carbon sinks and tax transparency.
FI
Finland Global Development: Aid Cuts, Tax Gaps, and a Forest Carbon Problem
Finland has long been a respected voice in global development, often punching above its weight. Yet its foreign policy is shifting fast. Aid is falling, tax transparency remains patchy, and its climate model faces a genuine internal contradiction. This article explains what changed, why it matters, and what it means for the Sustainable Development Goals.
Finland’s ODA: A Steady Decline Through 2027
Finland provided €1.25 billion in ODA in 2025, equal to 0.44% of gross national income. This fell 3.9% from 2024, and remains well short of the international 0.7% target. Finland’s ODA will shrink by 25% overall between 2024 and 2027.
Government cuts hit almost every channel at once. Finland’s exclusive ODA budget fell by €73 million in 2025 alone. The 2026 budget cuts a further €66 million from the Foreign Ministry, even as defence spending rises sharply toward 3% of GDP.
Ukraine remains Finland’s largest single partner, receiving €60 million in 2025. Multilateral channels absorb roughly half of Finland’s ODA, with €316 million routed through the EU, €254 million through the UN, and €76 million through the World Bank Group.
Civil society funding has fared better than most categories. Finnish CSOs received €124 million in 2025, a record share of the total. Humanitarian assistance also held steady at €117 million, protected as a government priority even as other budget lines shrink.
Finland’s development ministry now runs five core partner countries: Ethiopia, Nepal, Syria, Tanzania, and Ukraine. This is down from nine partner countries before 2024, reflecting a deliberate narrowing of geographic focus toward fewer, deeper relationships.
Finland’s Nepal partnership connects directly to RYB’s Nepal page. Finland’s rights-based, gender-focused approach has made Nepal one of its longest-standing bilateral relationships in Asia, spanning governance, education, and local democracy programmes.
Domestic Tax Transparency: A Mixed Record
Finland maintains a high tax-to-GDP ratio near 42%, funding strong social spending and comparatively generous aid. Transparency International consistently ranks Finland among the world’s least corrupt countries, a genuine strength in development diplomacy.
However, corporate ownership transparency tells a different story. The Tax Justice Network’s Financial Secrecy Index ranked Finland 88th out of 141 jurisdictions in 2022, a middling position. Finnwatch, a Finnish corporate watchdog, has criticised Finland’s beneficial ownership registry directly.
Finland’s registry only lists the largest company owners, not full ownership chains. This gap made it harder to trace sanctioned Russian oligarchs’ assets after 2022, according to Finnwatch. Weak ownership transparency also complicates tracking illicit financial flows from developing countries.
Finland has signed numerous tax information exchange agreements, and supports OECD-led international tax reforms. Yet critics note Finland has sometimes prioritised protecting its own tax base over more ambitious global reforms, including stronger minimum corporate tax proposals.
Finland also provides technical assistance for tax administration abroad. In 2023, it ranked first among DAC donors for the share of bilateral aid supporting domestic resource mobilisation in partner countries. Still, this remains small next to the scale of illicit financial flows facing developing nations.
Climate Leadership With a Forest-Sized Asterisk
Finland has committed to carbon neutrality by 2035, one of the most ambitious legally binding targets in the world. The Climate Change Act sets clear sectoral targets, and the Salmisaari coal plant near Helsinki closed in April 2025.
Roughly 92% of Finland’s energy now comes from low-carbon sources, combining nuclear, hydropower, and rapidly expanding wind capacity. The 2023 Olkiluoto nuclear plant addition strengthened this further, giving Finland one of Europe’s cleanest electricity grids.
However, Finland’s forests complicate this picture significantly. Boreal forests once absorbed around 30 million tonnes of CO2 annually between 1990 and 2010. That carbon sink has weakened sharply, turning into a net emissions source since 2021.
Continued high logging rates drive this decline, alongside climate-linked stress on forest growth. Woody biomass still supplies over a quarter of Finland’s primary energy, and existing logging regulations have proven largely ineffective at protecting the sink.
Finland needs its land-use sector to remove 17.8 million tonnes of CO2 annually by 2030, up from just 1 million tonnes in 2022. Meeting the 2035 neutrality target likely requires new technological carbon capture, since natural sinks alone may fall short.
This contradiction matters for Finland’s global credibility. A country urging climate ambition abroad, while its own forestry policy undermines its most important domestic carbon sink, invites exactly the kind of scrutiny Finland has so far avoided on most fronts.
Trade Policy: A Smaller, Quieter Exposure
Finland’s trade exposure to 2025’s tariff shifts remains more limited than larger EU economies. The EU-US trade agreement, settling most tariffs at 15%, still affects key Finnish export sectors directly.
Forestry products, machinery, and telecommunications equipment make up a significant share of Finnish exports to the US. Nokia’s network equipment and Finnish shipbuilders’ Arctic icebreaker expertise both face this new tariff environment, though neither faces sector-specific rates as steep as steel or aluminium.
Unlike larger economies, Finland has not used trade policy against developing countries. Its EU membership means Finnish trade policy operates collectively through Brussels, rather than through bilateral preference programmes Finland could adjust unilaterally.
What Finland Still Contributes
Despite budget pressure, Finland’s genuine development strengths remain intact. Finnish-style education reform, built on teacher autonomy and reduced standardised testing, continues to attract partner-country interest worldwide, particularly across Finland’s five priority countries.
Finland’s technology sector, anchored historically by Nokia, supports digital governance and service-delivery projects in partner countries. Finnish expertise in gender equality and social welfare policy also informs development programming, drawing on Finland’s own welfare-state experience.
Finland’s evaluation culture stands out among DAC donors. The 2024 OECD Peer Review found Finland had addressed eleven of twelve recommendations from its previous 2017 review, a notably strong compliance record for a mid-sized donor.
How This Connects to the SDGs
Finland ranks first globally on the 2026 Sustainable Development Report’s overall SDG Index, ahead of Sweden and Denmark. Yet the same report flags real weaknesses, particularly on SDG 15, life on land, driven partly by unsustainable consumption patterns and negative international spillovers.
Falling ODA directly threatens SDG 17, on global partnerships, just as Finland’s own peer review praised its strategic leadership on poverty and inequality. The weakening forest carbon sink undermines SDG 13, climate action, even as Finland’s electricity grid ranks among the world’s cleanest.
Corporate ownership opacity connects to SDG 16, strong institutions, and indirectly to SDG 10, reducing inequality, since weak beneficial ownership data can shield wealth extracted from developing countries. Finland’s high overall score does not erase these narrower, more specific gaps.
Because Finland scores so well in aggregate, these contradictions are easy to miss without looking closely. That is precisely why RYB tracks ODA, tax, and climate together for every country, rather than relying on a single headline ranking.
A Pattern, Not an Isolated Case
Finland cut ODA alongside Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the US, all of whom announced reductions for 2025-27. This marks broad, simultaneous retrenchment among traditional donors, not a uniquely Finnish choice.
Still, Finland’s protection of civil society funding and humanitarian aid, even amid cuts elsewhere, distinguishes its approach somewhat from harsher reductions seen in the Netherlands or the United States. Political choices within an overall decline still matter.
This reinforces a pattern RYB tracks across country pages: ODA levels reflect domestic political priorities, not fixed international commitments. They rise and fall with elections, coalition agreements, and competing budget pressures, in Helsinki as much as anywhere else.
Looking Forward
Finland enters the second half of this decade as a genuine SDG leader with real, specific vulnerabilities. Aid cuts continuing through 2027 will test whether Finland can sustain the strategic partnerships that earned its strong 2024 peer review.
The forest carbon sink represents the clearest test case ahead. Finland’s Medium-term Climate Policy Plan and Energy and Climate Strategy, both updated through 2025, will show whether new logging measures can reverse the sink’s decline in time for 2035.
Corporate ownership transparency offers a lower-cost opportunity for improvement. Strengthening the beneficial ownership registry would address a specific, well-documented gap without requiring new spending, unlike aid restoration or forest policy change.
RYB will track whether Finland’s five remaining partner countries receive stable funding despite budget pressure, and whether the country’s climate and tax gaps narrow or widen. This page will be updated as new government decisions and data emerge.
How we build this page
This page is part of the RYB five-page country profile for Finland, covering Global Development, SDGs, Culture Women’s Day, Gender Gap, and VAWG. Our country pages methodology explains the sources, reports, and research approach behind every page in this series.
Sources
- Finnish Government, “2025 saw historic decline in international development finance” — valtioneuvosto.fi
- Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Development cooperation appropriations — um.fi
- Finnish Government, “Budget proposal for the Ministry for Foreign Affairs 2026” — valtioneuvosto.fi
- OECD, Development Co-operation Profile: Finland — oecd.org
- OECD, “Cuts in official development assistance: Full Report” — oecd.org
- Xinhua, “Finland proposes broad spending cuts in 2026 budget” — english.news.cn
- Yle, “Finland performs poorly in financial transparency comparison, watchdog says” — yle.fi
- Helsinki Times, “Finland must improve transparency of business and tax data, demands Finnwatch” — helsinkitimes.fi
- Tax Justice Network, Indexes & Tools — taxjustice.net
- Climate Change Performance Index, Finland — ccpi.org
- Carbon Gap, “Carbon Removal in Finland – National Policy Overview” — tracker.carbongap.org
- Finnish State Treasury, “Carbon Neutral Finland 2035” — treasuryfinland.fi
- Sustainable Development Report 2026 (SDSN / Dublin University Press) — s3.amazonaws.com
- RYB, Official Development Assistance (ODA) — redyellowblue.org/finance/oda/
- RYB, Financial Secrecy — redyellowblue.org/finance/financial-secrecy/
Finland
Republic of Finland • Suomen tasavalta (Finnish) • Republiken Finland (Swedish)
Population
5,614,571 (2023 est.)
5,587,442 (2021)
5,571,665 (2020)
5,518,371 (2017)
Capital: Helsinki
Internet country code: .fi
Government
Official website: government.fi
Finland Promotion Board: finland.fi
Statistics Finland: stat.fi
UN
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Finland: ohchr.org/finland
Universal Periodic Review: ohchr.org/upr/fi
Background
Finland was a province and then a grand duchy under Sweden from the 12th to the 19th centuries, and an autonomous grand duchy of Russia after 1809. It gained complete independence in 1917. During World War II, it defended its independence through cooperation with Germany and resisted subsequent invasions by the Soviet Union, with some loss of territory.
In the following half century, Finland transformed from a farm and forest economy into a diversified modern industrial economy. Per capita income now ranks among the highest in Western Europe. Finland joined the European Union in 1995 and was the only Nordic state to adopt the euro at its launch in January 1999.
Today, Finland’s modern welfare state rests on three pillars: high-quality education, the promotion of equality, and a comprehensive social welfare system, currently tested by an aging population and a fluctuating, export-driven economy.