Gender Data: Bridging the Information Gap for Equitable Global Development
Gender data represents one of the most critical yet underdeveloped areas in global information systems. This systematic collection of sex-disaggregated information reveals disparities between women and men across economic, social, political, and health dimensions. The absence of comprehensive gender data hampers effective policy-making and perpetuates inequality. This article examines the current state of gender data globally, explores existing gaps, and highlights how better information can drive more equitable development outcomes.
Organizations
The Gender Data Revolution
The push for robust gender data gained momentum in the early 2010s. International organizations recognized that general statistics often masked significant disparities between men and women. The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) launched the “Making Every Woman and Girl Count” initiative in 2016. This program aims to help countries collect, analyze, and use gender statistics.
Data2X, established in 2012, emerged as another significant player. This technical platform works to improve the quality and availability of gender data. Their research identified 28 critical gaps in global gender statistics across five domains: health, education, economic opportunities, political participation, and human security.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) further elevated gender data importance. SDG 5 specifically targets gender equality, but gender dimensions appear across all 17 goals. The SDG framework includes 54 gender-specific indicators. However, less than 40% of these indicators have sufficient data for global monitoring.
The Current State of Gender Data Gaps
Gender data suffers from multiple deficiencies. These gaps vary by region but share common characteristics:
Availability Gaps
Many countries lack basic sex-disaggregated statistics. Only 13% of countries dedicate resources to regular gender statistics production. Civil registration systems often fail to register women’s births, marriages, and deaths as comprehensively as men’s. Without these fundamental records, downstream analysis becomes impossible.
Time-use surveys reveal particularly significant gaps. These instruments measure unpaid care work predominantly performed by women, yet only 75 countries conducted such surveys between 2000 and 2020. Most low-income nations have never implemented one.
Quality Gaps
Even when data exists, quality issues undermine reliability. Gender bias affects survey design, implementation, and analysis. For instance, household surveys typically interview the “household head,” often defaulting to a male respondent. This approach misses women’s perspectives and experiences.
Measurement problems persist across domains. Economic statistics often fail to capture women’s informal work and unpaid contributions. Health data may undercount maternal mortality in regions with weak medical systems. Educational statistics sometimes mask attendance issues affecting girls disproportionately.
Granularity Gaps
Broad national averages frequently obscure significant sub-group variations. Intersectionality matters—women face different challenges based on age, location, disability status, education level, and other factors. Few countries disaggregate gender data along these additional dimensions.
Rural women’s experiences differ markedly from urban counterparts. Indigenous women face unique barriers compared to non-indigenous women. Without granular data, policy interventions may help some women while overlooking others.
Critical Areas Needing Better Gender Data
Economic Participation
Women’s economic contributions remain severely undercounted. Labor force surveys often miss informal employment, where women concentrate globally. Agriculture statistics rarely capture women’s farming activities adequately, despite women constituting 40% of the agricultural workforce in developing countries.
Asset ownership presents particular measurement challenges. Land registries typically record formal title holders, predominantly men. The Gender Asset Gap Project found that data collection methods significantly impact findings regarding property ownership. Direct questioning of women yields different results than household-level inquiries.
Financial inclusion metrics have improved through the Global Findex Database. This resource reveals that globally, women remain 7 percentage points less likely than men to have a bank account. However, more detailed information about women’s financial behaviors, constraints, and needs remains limited.
Health and Well-being
Despite progress in health statistics, significant gaps persist. Maternal mortality data remains unreliable in regions lacking robust health information systems. The WHO estimates that about 40% of countries worldwide have no reliable maternal death registration system.
Sexual and reproductive health metrics face political and cultural barriers. Information about contraceptive access, abortion services, and adolescent sexuality encounters resistance in many contexts. This resistance creates data gaps that impede effective health service delivery.
Mental health statistics rarely incorporate gender dimensions adequately. Depression affects women at roughly twice the rate of men globally, yet gender-sensitive mental health interventions lack sufficient evidence base due to data limitations.
Violence Against Women
Violence against women represents perhaps the most challenging area for data collection. The sensitive nature of gender-based violence creates reporting barriers. Cultural taboos, fear of retaliation, and limited legal recourse reduce disclosure rates.
Standard crime statistics typically undercount gender-based violence significantly. Specialized surveys like the WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence provide more accurate information but require substantial resources. Only about 40% of countries produce statistics on violence against women, and methodological differences complicate cross-country comparisons.
Online violence and harassment constitute emerging data frontiers. As digital spaces grow increasingly important for economic and social participation, measuring and addressing online gender-based violence becomes crucial. Few countries systematically track these experiences.
Political Participation
Women’s representation in political institutions receives relatively good statistical coverage. The Inter-Parliamentary Union maintains data on women in national parliaments for most countries. However, information about women’s participation in local government, party leadership, and informal political processes remains sparse.
Voting behavior data often lacks gender disaggregation. Few countries analyze electoral participation patterns by gender, limiting understanding of potential disenfranchisement. Campaign financing statistics rarely track resources allocated to women candidates compared to men.
Environmental Interactions
Climate change affects women and men differently, yet gender-environment data remains underdeveloped. Women often bear disproportionate burdens from natural resource depletion and environmental degradation. Their roles in water collection, fuel gathering, and food production make them vulnerable to ecological changes.
Data on natural resource management rarely incorporates gender dimensions. Information about women’s land use patterns, conservation practices, and adaptation strategies could inform more effective environmental policies. The Gender and Environment Data Alliance, launched in 2021, aims to address these specific gaps.
Institutional Barriers to Gender Data Collection
Several structural factors limit gender data production:
Resource Constraints
National statistical offices frequently lack adequate funding, technical capacity, and personnel. Gender statistics often receive lower priority than economic indicators or population counts. The average cost of a high-quality household survey exceeds $1 million—a prohibitive amount for many developing countries.
International funding for statistical capacity building remains insufficient. The Partnership in Statistics for Development in the 21st Century (PARIS21) estimates that less than 0.3% of official development assistance supports statistical systems development.
Methodological Challenges
Measuring complex gender concepts presents technical difficulties. Concepts like empowerment, agency, and gender norms resist simple quantification. Indicators may oversimplify nuanced realities or miss critical dimensions entirely.
Respondent selection procedures introduce potential biases. When surveys interview only household heads or require husband’s permission for wife’s participation, results skew systematically. Sampling frames sometimes exclude marginalized women, particularly those in informal settlements or institutional settings.
Political Will
Gender statistics sometimes reveal uncomfortable truths about inequality. Governments may prefer to avoid documentation of gender discrimination within their societies. Political pressures can undermine data collection efforts, particularly around controversial topics like abortion access or intimate partner violence.
Gender data often challenges powerful interests. Property ownership statistics may conflict with traditional inheritance practices. Labor market information might expose systematic wage discrimination. These political dimensions can impede objective data collection.
Promising Initiatives and Solutions
Despite persistent challenges, several promising developments are improving gender data:
Technological Innovations
Mobile technology expands data collection possibilities. Phone surveys reach women directly, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. The World Bank’s Listening to Africa initiative uses mobile phone interviews to gather gender-disaggregated information on living conditions and service access.
Satellite imagery combined with demographic data enables new analysis approaches. Researchers can identify correlations between women’s status and observable physical characteristics like agricultural patterns, infrastructure development, and settlement structures.
Big data offers supplementary information sources. Social media content, mobile phone metadata, and financial transaction records provide insights into gender patterns. UN Global Pulse projects analyze digital data streams to understand women’s mobility, economic behaviors, and social interactions.
Methodological Innovations
Experimental approaches improve measurement accuracy. Cognitive interviewing helps researchers understand how respondents interpret survey questions. List experiments and randomized response techniques increase disclosure of sensitive information like domestic violence experiences.
Mixed-methods research combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. This integration provides both statistical patterns and contextual understanding. Qualitative insights help interpret quantitative findings and identify appropriate indicators for complex concepts.
Time-diary methods capture women’s activities more accurately than traditional labor force surveys. These detailed accounts document unpaid care work and multiple simultaneous responsibilities. The International Conference of Labour Statisticians adopted new standards in 2013 recognizing unpaid production work as economically valuable.
Institutional Reforms
Gender mainstreaming in statistical systems drives improvement. Countries like the Philippines, Mexico, and Sweden have integrated gender perspectives throughout their national statistical programs. This systemic approach ensures consistent sex-disaggregation across data collection efforts.
International standards harmonize methodologies across countries. The UN Minimum Set of Gender Indicators provides a common framework for national statistical offices. The UN Statistical Commission’s Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Gender Statistics coordinates global efforts.
Public-private partnerships expand resources for gender data. The Data2X initiative partners with private companies to leverage alternative data sources. The Bloomberg Philanthropies Data for Health Initiative strengthens civil registration systems, improving vital statistics for women and girls.
Impact of Better Gender Data
Improved gender data drives concrete changes:
Policy Reform
Gender statistics reveal previously invisible problems. When India’s time-use survey documented women’s water collection burden, infrastructure investments shifted toward improved water access in underserved areas. Policy priorities change when gender disparities become statistically visible.
Evidence-based interventions become possible with better data. Mexico’s Progresa/Oportunidades program used household survey data to target conditional cash transfers to mothers. This approach stemmed from evidence about women’s spending patterns benefiting children’s welfare.
Resource allocation improves with gender-disaggregated information. Gender-responsive budgeting relies on statistical evidence to direct public funds toward areas with greatest gender impacts. Countries like Austria, Morocco, and South Korea have implemented such systems nationally.
Accountability
Gender statistics enable progress tracking. The SDG monitoring framework measures advancement toward gender equality targets. This accountability mechanism puts pressure on governments to demonstrate results rather than merely express commitments.
Civil society organizations use gender data for advocacy. When official statistics documented declining female labor force participation in India, women’s organizations launched campaigns addressing barriers to women’s employment. Data provides legitimacy to equity demands.
International comparisons motivate improvement. Gender indices like the Global Gender Gap Report create competitive pressure for countries to address disparities. No government wants to rank poorly on highly publicized international metrics.
Economic Benefits
Gender data supports economic arguments for equality. The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that advancing women’s equality could add $12 trillion to global GDP by 2025. Such projections rely on gender-disaggregated economic data and demonstrate equality’s financial benefits.
Labor market efficiency improves with better information. When employers understand gender-specific barriers to workforce participation, they can implement targeted solutions. Childcare provision, flexible scheduling, and transportation assistance address constraints revealed through gender data.
Financial services expand to underserved women when institutions understand their needs. Sex-disaggregated financial inclusion data from Global Findex has informed product development at major banks and microfinance institutions.
The Path Forward
Closing gender data gaps requires concerted action across multiple domains:
Funding Priorities
Sustainable financing for gender statistics needs establishment. The UN Women’s “Making Every Woman and Girl Count” program requires approximately $65 million over five years—a modest investment relative to potential benefits. Similar initiatives need stable, long-term support.
National budgets must prioritize gender data collection. Countries should allocate sufficient resources to statistical offices specifically for sex-disaggregated data production. These allocations represent investments in more efficient policy development.
Public-private partnerships offer supplementary resources. Private companies increasingly recognize business value in understanding women’s economic behaviors and preferences. These interests can align with public sector data needs.
Capacity Building
Statistical offices need gender expertise. Training programs should build technical skills specific to gender data collection, analysis, and communication. The UN Statistical Division provides such training but reaches limited audiences.
Data users require support as well as producers. Government officials, civil society organizations, and researchers need skills to interpret and apply gender statistics effectively. Training programs should target both data supply and demand sides.
South-South cooperation offers efficient capacity transfer. Countries with strong gender statistics programs, like the Philippines and Mexico, can share methodologies and systems with peers facing similar challenges and contexts.
Policy Integration
Gender data production should align with policy cycles. Statistics become most valuable when timed to inform policy development, implementation, and evaluation. Coordination between statistical offices and policy-making bodies enhances data relevance.
Open data principles expand impact potential. When gender statistics become publicly accessible in user-friendly formats, diverse stakeholders can leverage them for research, advocacy, and innovation. Open access maximizes return on data investment.
International harmonization facilitates global learning. Common methodologies, definitions, and indicators enable cross-country comparisons and collective progress assessment. Regional bodies like UNESCAP and UNECA can coordinate these harmonization efforts.
Looking Forward
The gender data landscape continues evolving rapidly. Several trends will shape future developments:
First, intersectional approaches will grow increasingly important. Gender never operates in isolation from other identity factors like race, ethnicity, disability status, and sexual orientation. Future data systems must capture these intersections to reveal how different women experience unique challenges and opportunities.
Second, user-centered design will improve data relevance. Consulting women and girls about their information needs ensures statistics address real priorities rather than researchers’ assumptions. Participatory approaches enhance both data quality and utilization.
Third, technological innovation will continue creating new opportunities. Artificial intelligence applications can process unstructured data sources for gender insights. Mobile platforms reach previously inaccessible populations. Blockchain systems might eventually strengthen women’s property documentation.
Fourth, data sovereignty concerns will require careful navigation. As gender data collection intensifies, ethical questions about consent, privacy, and ownership grow increasingly important. Frameworks must balance information needs against potential harms, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Finally, integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches will deepen understanding. Numbers alone cannot capture the full complexity of gender dynamics. Mixed-methods research combining statistical patterns with lived experiences provides more complete perspectives.
Gender data represents not merely a technical challenge but a transformative opportunity. When women and girls become fully visible in our information systems, policies and programs can respond more effectively to their needs. This visibility constitutes a crucial step toward genuine equality. The data revolution must be a gender data revolution to fulfill its promise of leaving no one behind.
UN Women
Explore the Data
What progress are we making on achieving gender equality in the SDGs? On the Women Count hub you will find updated data on gender-specific SDG indicators in one place. You can also find data for our flagship report Progress of the World’s Women. Coming soon: data on women, peace and security, violence against women and a transparency gateway on UN Women programme results.
– data.unwomen.org
The Womanstats Project
The WomanStats Project is a team of approximately twelve undergraduate research assistants, seven graduate research assistants, thirteen principal investigators, and over 120 former student assistants. We are dedicated to the continual expansion of the WomanStats Database, as well as the pursuit of our research agenda assessing the relationship between the situation and security of women, and the dynamics between security, stability, and the behavior of the state.
– womanstats.org