UN Tax Convention, Creating a Fairer Global Tax System

UN Tax Convention logo
Global Development

The UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation: Transforming Global Tax Systems

The world stands at a crossroads in international taxation. Multinational corporations shift profits across borders. Wealthy individuals hide assets in tax havens. Meanwhile, developing nations struggle to fund basic services.

The UN Tax Convention, officially the “UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation,” emerges as a response. This initiative aims to create a fairer global tax system. It seeks to ensure all countries can collect their rightful tax revenue.

Why Does the UN Tax Convention Exist?

The current international tax system has serious flaws. It was designed decades ago for a different world. Today’s digital economy creates new challenges. Large tech companies operate globally but pay taxes in few countries. This system disadvantages developing nations. They lose billions in potential tax revenue each year. Moreover, the existing frameworks exclude many countries from decision-making. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) leads current efforts. However, most developing nations lack meaningful participation. The UN convention addresses these inequities. It promises inclusive participation for all 193 member states. This democratic approach contrasts with current exclusive arrangements.

What Does the Convention Aim to Achieve?

The convention pursues several key objectives. First, it wants to create an inclusive tax cooperation system. All countries should have equal voice in tax policy decisions.

Second, it aims to ensure fair taxation of multinational enterprises. These companies should pay appropriate taxes wherever they operate. This principle particularly benefits developing countries.

Third, the convention targets tax evasion by wealthy individuals. High-net-worth persons often avoid taxes through complex schemes. The treaty seeks to close these loopholes.

Additionally, the framework addresses digital taxation challenges. Online services cross borders easily but taxation remains complex. The convention aims to simplify these rules.

Finally, it supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Better tax collection helps fund education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These investments drive sustainable development.

Historical Overview

The journey toward this convention began years ago. Developing countries consistently raised concerns about unfair tax systems. They argued for more inclusive international cooperation.

In December 2023, momentum accelerated significantly. The UN General Assembly passed Resolution 78/230. This resolution established an Ad Hoc Committee with clear mandates.

The committee’s task was specific yet ambitious. It would draft terms of reference for the convention. These terms would guide future negotiations.

The process gained unprecedented support from civil society. Thirty organizations, including Oxfam and Amnesty International, submitted proposals. They advocated for human rights-centered tax policies.

The 2024 Negotiations and Voting

First Negotiation Round

From April 26 to May 8, 2024, historic negotiations began. All 193 UN member states participated for the first time. The meetings occurred at UN headquarters in New York.

These discussions were groundbreaking. Never before had such inclusive tax negotiations taken place. Developing countries finally had equal seats at the table.

The negotiations addressed fundamental questions. What should the convention cover? How inclusive should the process be? What protocols should accompany the main treaty?

Second Session Results

The second negotiation session ran from July 29 to August 16, 2024. This session proved more decisive than the first. The Ad Hoc Committee finalized its recommendations.

On August 16, 2024, the committee held a crucial vote. They approved the terms of reference for the convention. The voting results revealed clear global divisions.

Voting Results – August 2024:
  • In favor: 110 countries
  • Against: 8 countries (Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, United States)
  • Abstentions: 44 countries

The vote demonstrated strong developing country support. However, most wealthy nations remained skeptical. This division would continue into subsequent votes.

The 2025 Developments

General Assembly Vote

In November 2024, the UN General Assembly considered the committee’s recommendations. The vote established the formal negotiating process. Again, divisions emerged along economic lines.

General Assembly Voting Results – November 2024:
  • In favor: 125 delegations
  • Against: 9 delegations
  • Abstentions: 46 delegations

The resolution passed despite opposition from wealthy countries. This vote formally launched the three-year negotiation process.

Organizational Session

February 3-6, 2025 marked another milestone. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee held its organizational session. This meeting established the negotiation framework.

However, tensions from previous votes persisted. Developed countries continued expressing reservations. They worried about duplicating existing OECD efforts.

Nevertheless, the process moved forward. The committee planned annual sessions through 2027. Each session would advance the convention’s development.

Terms of Reference Approval

In January 2025, the General Assembly took another significant step. It approved the final terms of reference for the convention. This approval cleared the path for substantive negotiations.

The terms outline the convention’s scope and objectives. They emphasize inclusivity, fairness, and sustainable development. Two protocols will accompany the main treaty.

Key Features of the UN Tax Convention

Inclusive Participation

Unlike existing frameworks, this convention ensures universal participation. All UN member states have equal voice and vote. This approach contrasts sharply with OECD-led initiatives.

Developing countries particularly value this inclusivity. They’ve been marginalized in international tax policy for decades. The UN process finally addresses their concerns.

Comprehensive Scope

The convention addresses multiple tax cooperation areas. It covers multinational enterprise taxation comprehensively. Digital economy taxation receives special attention through dedicated protocols.

Tax evasion by wealthy individuals faces new scrutiny. The treaty aims to enhance information exchange. This cooperation helps countries track hidden assets.

Furthermore, the convention promotes sustainable development. It recognizes taxation’s role in achieving SDGs. This connection makes the treaty unique among international agreements.

Dual Protocol System

The convention includes two binding protocols simultaneously. The first addresses digital economy taxation challenges. This protocol tackles cross-border service taxation.

The second protocol covers additional cooperation areas. These might include tax dispute resolution. They could also address specific regional challenges.

This dual approach ensures comprehensive coverage. It avoids the fragmented system currently in place.

Global Reactions and Positions

Developing Country Support

Developing nations strongly support the convention. They view it as long-overdue recognition of their concerns. These countries stand to gain significantly from fairer taxation.

African nations particularly champion the initiative. They estimate losing billions annually to tax avoidance. The convention promises to recover substantial revenues.

Latin American countries also express enthusiasm. They see potential for increased social spending. Better tax collection could fund education and healthcare improvements.

Developed Country Concerns

Wealthy nations remain largely skeptical. They prefer existing OECD frameworks to UN initiatives. They argue against duplicating current efforts.

The United States leads opposition efforts. American officials worry about sovereignty concerns. They prefer bilateral and regional approaches to multilateral treaties.

European Union positions vary by member state. Some support increased cooperation while others prefer OECD leadership. This division complicates unified EU positions.

Civil Society Engagement

Non-governmental organizations strongly advocate for the convention. Tax justice groups see it as crucial for global equity. Human rights organizations connect it to development funding.

Oxfam estimates the convention could generate billions in additional revenue. This money could fund essential public services. It could also support climate change adaptation.

Academic experts generally support the initiative. They argue current systems inadequately address modern challenges. The UN process offers necessary updates.

Challenges and Obstacles

Political Divisions

The voting patterns reveal deep political divisions. Wealthy countries fear losing influence over tax policy. They prefer systems they currently control.

Developing countries demand equal participation rights. They’re tired of accepting rules made without them. This fundamental disagreement creates ongoing tensions.

Technical Complexity

International tax law involves enormous complexity. Creating universally acceptable rules challenges negotiators. Different legal systems complicate harmonization efforts.

Digital economy taxation presents particular difficulties. Technology evolves faster than regulatory frameworks. The convention must remain flexible yet comprehensive.

Implementation Concerns

Even successful negotiations face implementation challenges. Countries must modify domestic laws accordingly. This process often encounters political resistance.

Enforcement mechanisms need careful design. The convention requires effective dispute resolution procedures. Without these, compliance becomes voluntary.

Resource Requirements

Negotiating the convention demands substantial resources. Developing countries often lack adequate technical expertise. They need capacity building support.

Implementation also requires significant investments. Countries must upgrade tax administration systems. This modernization demands both money and time.

Potential Impact

Revenue Generation

Successful implementation could generate substantial additional revenues. Estimates suggest billions of dollars annually for developing countries. This money could transform public service delivery.

Better multinational taxation particularly benefits resource-rich nations. These countries often lose revenue to profit-shifting schemes. The convention aims to prevent such losses.

Development Financing

Increased tax revenues directly support SDG achievement. Countries could invest more in education and healthcare. Infrastructure development would also benefit significantly.

Climate action requires massive financing. Additional tax revenues could support green energy transitions. They could also fund climate adaptation projects.

System Legitimacy

A UN convention would enhance international tax system legitimacy. Current arrangements exclude most countries from decision-making. The new framework promises genuine inclusivity.

This legitimacy boost could improve voluntary compliance. Countries respect systems they help create. Participation breeds ownership and commitment.

Looking Forward

The UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation represents a historic opportunity. It could fundamentally reshape global tax governance. Success depends on navigating complex political and technical challenges.

The next three years will prove crucial. Annual negotiating sessions must balance competing interests. Developing and developed countries need to find common ground.

Technical working groups will address detailed implementation questions. These groups must resolve complex legal and administrative issues. Their work will determine the convention’s practical effectiveness.

Civil society organizations will continue advocating for ambitious outcomes. They provide crucial expertise and political pressure. Their engagement helps ensure the convention serves public interests.

The convention’s success ultimately depends on political will. Countries must prioritize collective benefits over narrow interests. They must recognize that fair taxation serves everyone’s long-term interests.

If successful, the convention could mark a turning point in global governance. It would demonstrate that inclusive international cooperation remains possible. It would show that the UN can address 21st-century challenges effectively.

The stakes extend far beyond taxation policy. They encompass sustainable development, global equity, and international cooperation’s future. The world watches as this historic process unfolds.

Success would provide developing countries with resources for transformation. It would ensure multinational corporations contribute fairly to societies. It would create a more just and sustainable global economy.

The journey ahead remains challenging but the destination justifies the effort. A fairer international tax system benefits everyone. It strengthens the foundation for peaceful and prosperous global development.

Breaking the ice in the UN Tax Convention negotiations

Sept 4, 2025 – The initial timid steps on the long road to a UN Convention on International Tax Cooperation were taken last month as government negotiators, civil society, trade unions, academia and business representatives met in New York for the first rounds of substance negotiations from 4-15 August.
> eurodad.org/un_tax_convention_negotiations

Sources and Links