Women’s Right to Vote in Romania
Women’s Day Romania / November 19, (1946)
Right-wing feminist congress in Bucharest, Romania, March 1932. Hosted by the National Orthodox Society of Romanian Women (whose president, Alexandrina Cantacuzino, is pictured front row, third from right), it demanded from King Carol II the introduction of womențs suffrage and full civic rights.
Women’s Right to Vote in Romania: A Historical Overview
Romania’s journey toward women’s suffrage was gradual and complex. While universal male suffrage was established in 1918, women faced significant hurdles in gaining political rights. The 1923 Constitution hinted at the possibility of women’s suffrage, but the Electoral Law of 1926 maintained voting rights exclusively for men. In 1929, a limited form of suffrage was granted to women, allowing them to vote in local elections under specific qualifications. However, full electoral rights remained elusive.Early Struggles (1866-1914)
The struggle for women’s suffrage in Romania began in the late 19th century. After Romania gained independence in 1877, the young nation established its first constitution in 1866. Unfortunately, this document explicitly denied voting rights to women. Article 7 specifically limited political rights to male citizens only [1].
Romanian women faced significant legal and social barriers during this period. They could not manage their own property without male consent. Additionally, they had limited access to education and professional opportunities. Despite these obstacles, early feminist consciousness began to emerge [2].
The first women’s rights organization in Romania, Liga Drepturilor Femeilor (The Women’s Rights League), formed in 1894. Eugenia de Reuss Ianculescu, a pioneering activist, founded this organization. The League advocated for various women’s rights, including suffrage, education, and legal equality [3]. Their newspaper, “Dochia,” became an important platform for feminist ideas.
In 1913, Romania hosted the International Women’s Suffrage Alliance Congress in Budapest (then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire). This event connected Romanian feminists with the international women’s movement. Consequently, it strengthened their resolve and strategies [4].
World War I and Its Aftermath (1914-1929)
World War I dramatically changed Romanian society. Women took on new roles as men left for the battlefield. They worked in factories, hospitals, and administrative positions. This shift demonstrated women’s capabilities beyond traditional domestic roles [5].
After the war, Greater Romania emerged through the unification with Transylvania, Bessarabia, and Bukovina. This territorial expansion created political opportunities. The new constitution needed to accommodate diverse populations and modern ideas. Feminists seized this moment to intensify their campaigns [6].
In 1917, women in Bessarabia (now Moldova) received voting rights when the region declared autonomy from Russia. However, these rights remained regional rather than national. Meanwhile, the Romanian Women’s National Council formed in 1921 under Princess Alexandrina Cantacuzino. This organization united various women’s groups to demand constitutional recognition [7].
The 1923 Constitution brought limited progress. Article 6 stated that “special laws, voted with a two-thirds majority, will determine the conditions under which women can exercise political rights” [8]. This vague promise allowed for future legislation but did not guarantee immediate suffrage.
Princess Cantacuzino represented Romania at the League of Nations, becoming the first Romanian woman in such a prominent international role. Her diplomatic efforts highlighted women’s political capabilities. Furthermore, her aristocratic status gave the movement valuable social credibility [9].
Partial Victory and Continued Struggle (1929-1938)
A significant breakthrough came in 1929. The Local Administrative Law granted limited voting rights to specific categories of women. Those who had completed secondary education, worked in public service, or were war widows could now vote in local elections [10]. While this represented progress, it excluded the majority of Romanian women, particularly those in rural areas with limited educational opportunities.
The Association for the Civil and Political Emancipation of Romanian Women, led by feminist lawyer Ella Negruzzi, continued pushing for universal women’s suffrage. Negruzzi, Romania’s first female lawyer, used her legal expertise to challenge discriminatory legislation. Her persistent advocacy kept the issue in public discourse [11].
During this period, Romanian feminists employed various strategies. They organized public lectures, published articles, and petitioned legislators. International connections remained crucial, with Romanian delegates attending European and international women’s conferences. These networks provided moral support and practical strategies [12].
The Great Depression hit Romania severely in the early 1930s. Economic hardship temporarily overshadowed political rights campaigns. Nevertheless, feminist publications like “Femeia Româna” (The Romanian Woman) continued advocating for women’s political participation as essential for national recovery [13].
Full Suffrage and Authoritarian Setbacks (1938-1947)
In February 1938, King Carol II established a royal dictatorship. Paradoxically, the new authoritarian constitution granted full voting rights to women over 30 who could read and write [14]. This decision aligned with other European countries that had recently extended suffrage to women. However, political rights meant little in a regime where free elections no longer existed.
Romania entered World War II in 1941 as an Axis power under Ion Antonescu’s military dictatorship. The war effort required female labor and support. Women’s patriotic contributions during this period further demonstrated their civic importance. Nevertheless, genuine democratic rights remained suspended for all citizens [15].
After the war, Romania fell under Soviet influence. The communist-dominated government established after 1945 granted universal suffrage to all citizens regardless of gender, education, or property requirements. The March 1945 decree and subsequent 1948 Constitution formally recognized women’s political equality [16]. However, these rights existed within a one-party system that limited genuine political choice.
Communist Era (1947-1989)
The communist period presented a complex picture for women’s political rights. On paper, women had full equality. The 1952 Constitution declared: “Women in the Romanian People’s Republic have equal rights with men in all fields of economic, political, and cultural life” [17]. In practice, the reality proved more complicated.
The regime promoted women’s political participation through quotas. By the 1980s, approximately 30% of the Grand National Assembly (parliament) consisted of women [18]. However, these representatives had limited actual power in a system dominated by Nicolae Ceaușescu and the Communist Party leadership.
Women’s political representation resembled a facade rather than genuine empowerment. Elena Ceaușescu, the dictator’s wife, held significant power as a high-ranking party official. However, her position stemmed from personal connections rather than feminist achievement. Her leadership did not translate into broader women’s rights [19].
The communist state established the National Council of Women as the official women’s organization. This group implemented party policies rather than advocating for independent women’s interests. Feminist activism outside approved channels faced severe repression [20].
Democratic Transition and Contemporary Developments (1989-Present)
The 1989 Revolution overthrew the Ceaușescu regime. Romania began its difficult transition to democracy. The 1991 Constitution guaranteed equal rights regardless of gender. Article 16 states: “Citizens are equal before the law and public authorities, without any privilege or discrimination” [21]. This legal equality included full voting rights for women.
However, women’s political representation declined dramatically after communism. Without quotas, the percentage of women in parliament dropped below 5% in the early 1990s [22]. This decline revealed how institutional mechanisms rather than cultural acceptance had maintained women’s previous political presence.
In 2000, Romania began EU accession negotiations. European standards required gender equality policies. Consequently, Romania established the National Agency for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men in 2005. This institution works to increase women’s political participation through training, awareness, and policy development [23].
Several NGOs emerged to promote women’s political rights. The Romanian Women’s Lobby, established in 2007, advocates for greater female representation in decision-making positions [24]. Similarly, the Center for Partnership and Equality implements programs to encourage women’s political candidacies. These organizations face limited resources but maintain persistent advocacy.
Romania joined the European Union in 2007. This membership brought new legal frameworks supporting gender equality. The EU’s emphasis on balanced representation influenced Romanian political discourse. Nevertheless, progress remained slow [25].
Electoral law reforms in 2015 introduced gender quotas for party lists in local elections. Parties must nominate at least 30% women candidates, though placement on lists remains unregulated [26]. This measure has modestly increased women’s representation in local councils. However, national parliament representation still lags behind European averages.
Key Figures in Romanian Women’s Suffrage
Several remarkable women shaped Romania’s suffrage movement. Their persistence created pathways for future generations. These pioneers deserve recognition:
Eugenia de Reuss Ianculescu (1866-1938) founded the League for Women’s Rights in 1894. Her tireless activism spanned over four decades. She edited feminist publications and organized numerous campaigns. Her international connections strengthened the Romanian movement [27].
Princess Alexandrina Cantacuzino (1876-1944) used her aristocratic position to advance women’s rights. She founded the National Council of Romanian Women in 1921. Her diplomatic skills brought Romanian women’s issues to international attention through her work with the League of Nations [28].
Ella Negruzzi (1876-1949) became Romania’s first female lawyer in 1913. She established the Association for the Civil and Political Emancipation of Romanian Women. Her legal expertise proved valuable in challenging discriminatory legislation. Additionally, she personally ran for office several times to challenge exclusionary practices [29].
Calypso Botez (1880-1933) wrote extensively on women’s legal status. Her 1919 book “The Problem of Feminism in Romania” outlined comprehensive arguments for women’s suffrage. She served on the Bucharest City Council after the 1929 partial suffrage victory [30].
Maria Baiulescu (1860-1941) led the Romanian Women’s Union in Transylvania. She advocated for women’s rights within the Austro-Hungarian Empire before unification with Romania. After 1918, she worked to harmonize women’s movements across Greater Romania’s diverse regions [31].
Modern Female Politicians and Contemporary Issues
Since 1989, several women have achieved significant political positions in Romania. Their careers demonstrate both progress and persistent challenges:
Ana Blandiana, poet and civil society activist, played a crucial role in Romania’s democratization. Though not a formal politician, her moral authority influenced political developments. She founded the Civic Alliance and the Memorial of the Victims of Communism [32].
Monica Macovei served as Justice Minister (2004-2007) and led crucial anti-corruption reforms during Romania’s EU accession. Later elected to the European Parliament, she advocated for judicial independence and transparency [33].
Viorica Dăncilă became Romania’s first female Prime Minister in 2018. Her appointment represented a symbolic milestone. However, critics noted she held limited independent power within her political party structure [34].
Despite these individual achievements, structural barriers persist. Gender stereotypes continue influencing media coverage of female politicians. Women face heightened scrutiny regarding appearance and family responsibilities. Additionally, political parties typically nominate women for less competitive positions [35].
Rural-urban divisions affect women’s political participation. Urban women with higher education levels engage more actively in politics. Meanwhile, rural women face traditional attitudes and limited resources. These disparities create uneven political representation across regions [36].
Violence against women in politics presents another serious barrier. A 2020 study revealed that 67% of Romanian female politicians experienced some form of harassment or intimidation. Online abuse particularly targets women in public office. These hostile environments discourage potential candidates [37].
Looking Forward
Romania continues evolving in women’s political representation. Several promising developments suggest positive future directions. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain.
Recent electoral cycles show gradual improvements. Women’s representation in the Romanian Parliament reached 18.5% after the 2020 elections—the highest level in the post-communist period [38]. While still below the EU average of 32%, this trend indicates progress. New political parties typically feature higher percentages of women candidates than established ones.
Educational initiatives target future generations. Gender equality curricula in some schools aim to shift cultural attitudes. Additionally, university programs in gender studies prepare specialists who can address structural inequalities. These educational investments may yield long-term changes in political culture [39].
International commitments provide accountability mechanisms. Romania has pledged to implement UN Sustainable Development Goal 5 on gender equality, including targets for women’s political participation. European Union monitoring creates additional pressure for progress [40].
Digital activism opens new avenues for women’s political engagement. Social media platforms allow diverse voices to reach audiences directly. Online organizing tools facilitate grassroots mobilization. These technological opportunities may help overcome traditional barriers [41].
Intersectional approaches increasingly recognize diversity among Romanian women. Roma women, rural women, and women with disabilities face compound discrimination. New advocacy efforts address these overlapping challenges. More inclusive movements strengthen democratic representation [42].
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed women’s crucial leadership in crisis management. Female healthcare administrators, scientists, and community organizers demonstrated essential skills. This visibility may translate into greater political opportunities and changed public perceptions [43].
As Romania continues its democratic development, women’s full political participation remains essential. From the pioneering suffragists of the 19th century to today’s parliamentary representatives, women have persistently claimed their rightful place in Romanian politics. The journey toward equal representation continues. Each electoral cycle brings opportunities to build upon this hard-won legacy of political rights.
References
[1] Ștefania Mihăilescu, “Din istoria feminismului românesc: Antologie de texte (1838-1929)” (Polirom, 2002), 45-48.
[2] Maria Bucur, “Between Liberal and Republican Citizenship: Feminism and Nationalism in Romania, 1880-1918,” Aspasia 6 (2012): 25-54. https://doi.org/10.3167/asp.2012.060103
[3] Roxana Cheșchebec, “The ‘Silent’ History of Women in Romanian Politics,” in Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Richard E. Matland and Kathleen A. Montgomery (Oxford University Press, 2003), 78-94.
[4] Francisca de Haan et al., eds., A Biographical Dictionary of Women’s Movements and Feminisms: Central, Eastern, and South Eastern Europe, 19th and 20th Centuries (Central European University Press, 2006), 321-324.
[5] Maria Bucur, Heroes and Victims: Remembering War in Twentieth-Century Romania (Indiana University Press, 2009), 72-89.
[6] Roxana Cheșchebec, “Feminist Movements in Romania: Between Historical Legacies and Contemporary Challenges,” Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială 75 (2021): 254-271. https://www.rcis.ro/images/documente/rcis75_16.pdf
[7] Ghizela Cosma, “Women in Romania: Between Tradition and Modernity,” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 1, no. 3 (2002): 128-150.
[8] “Constitution of Romania, 1923,” Digital Repository of the Romanian Parliament. http://www.cdep.ro/pls/legis/legis_pck.htp_act_text?idt=1517
[9] Alexandra Ghiț, “Princess Alexandrina Cantacuzino and the Birth of Interwar Romanian Feminism,” Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai – Historia 62, no. 1 (2017): 99-122.
[10] “Administrative Law of 1929,” Official Gazette of Romania, No. 170, August 3, 1929.
[11] Maria Nicoleta Turliuc and Cătălin Turliuc, “Women’s Rights in Interwar Romania: Continuity and Change,” Romanian Journal of Society and Politics 13, no. 1 (2018): 115-137.
[12] Ștefania Mihăilescu, Din istoria feminismului românesc: Antologie de texte (1929-1948) (Polirom, 2006), 156-172.
[13] Oana Băluță, “Representing Women’s Interests in the Interwar Period,” Sfera Politicii 178 (2013): 54-62. http://revistasferapoliticii.ro/sfera/178/art08-Baluta.php
[14] “Constitution of Romania, 1938,” Digital Repository of the Romanian Parliament. http://www.cdep.ro/pls/legis/legis_pck.htp_act_text?idt=9206
[15] Dennis Deletant, Hitler’s Forgotten Ally: Ion Antonescu and His Regime, Romania 1940-1944 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 187-195.
[16] “Constitution of the Romanian People’s Republic, 1948,” Official Gazette of Romania, No. 87, April 13, 1948.
[17] “Constitution of the Romanian People’s Republic, 1952,” Official Gazette of Romania, No. 1, September 27, 1952.
[18] Mary Ellen Fischer, “Women in Romanian Politics: Elena Ceaușescu, Pronatalism, and the Promotion of Women,” in Women, State, and Party in Eastern Europe, eds. Sharon L. Wolchik and Alfred G. Meyer (Duke University Press, 1985), 121-137.
[19] Jill Massino, Ambiguous Transitions: Gender, the State, and Everyday Life in Socialist and Postsocialist Romania (Berghahn Books, 2019), 205-226.
[20] Mihaela Miroiu, “State Men, Market Women: The Effects of Left Conservatism on Gender Politics in Romanian Transition,” Feminismo/s 3 (2004): 207-234. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2004.3.15
[21] “Constitution of Romania, 1991 (revised 2003),” Official Gazette of Romania, No. 767, October 31, 2003. http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?id=371
[22] Inter-Parliamentary Union, “Women in National Parliaments: Statistical Archive” (1997). https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking?month=1&year=1997
[23] National Agency for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men, “National Strategy for Gender Equality 2018-2021.” https://anes.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Strategia-Nationala-ES-2018-2021.pdf
[24] Romanian Women’s Lobby, “Activity Report 2018-2020” (2020). https://www.womenlobby.org/Romanian-Women-s-Lobby
[25] European Institute for Gender Equality, “Gender Equality Index for Romania” (2020). https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2020/country/RO
[26] Law No. 115/2015 on the Election of Local Public Administration Authorities, Official Gazette of Romania, No. 349, May 20, 2015.
[27] Maria Nicoleta Turliuc, “Romanian Feminist Movement between Ideal and Reality,” Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies 14 (2020): 45-61.
[28] Francisca de Haan et al., eds., Encyclopedia of Women’s Activism and Participation in Europe and the Americas (Oxford University Press, 2012), 108-110.
[29] Ștefania Mihăilescu, “Ella Negruzzi: Pioneer of Women’s Rights in Romania,” Romanian Journal of Population Studies 11, no. 1 (2017): 85-98.
[30] Alexandra Petrescu, “Calypso Botez and the Constitutional Debates of 1923,” Revista de Științe Politice 60 (2018): 97-108.
[31] Ghizela Cosma, “Unification and Women’s Movement in Transylvania after 1918,” Yearbook of the Gheorghe Sincai Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities 15 (2012): 77-85.
[32] Ana Blandiana, False Treatise of Manipulation (Humanitas, 2013). Official website: http://www.anablandiana.eu
[33] European Parliament, “Monica Macovei MEP Profile” (2009-2019). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96824/MONICA_MACOVEI/history/8
[34] William Totok, “Romania’s First Female Prime Minister May Be an Unwitting Pawn,” Deutsche Welle, January 17, 2018. https://www.dw.com/en/romanias-first-female-prime-minister-may-be-an-unwitting-pawn/a-42187135
[35] Oana Băluță and Ioana Cârstacea, “Gender and Political Representation in Romania: From Quotas to Male Dominance,” Politics & Gender 16, no. 3 (2020): 752-777. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000643
[36] Expert Forum, “Participation without Barriers: Electoral Rights of People with Disabilities and Women in Rural Areas” (2020). https://expertforum.ro/en/participation-without-barriers/
[37] National Democratic Institute, “Violence Against Women in Politics: Romania” (2020). https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/VAW-PROMANIAFinal.pdf
[38] Inter-Parliamentary Union, “Romania: Percentage of Women in National Parliament” (2021). https://data.ipu.org/content/romania
[39] Ministry of Education, “Education for Gender Equality in Romanian Schools” (2019). https://www.edu.ro/sites/default/files/_fi%C8%99iere/Minister/2019/Transparenta/Stare%20invatamant/raport_stare_invatamant/RAPORT_PRIVIND_STAREA_INVATAMANTULUI_PREUNIVERSITAR_DIN_ROMANIA_2019.pdf
[40] Government of Romania, “Voluntary National Review of Implementation of the 2030 Agenda” (2018). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19952Romania_VNR_2018_Romania.pdf
[41] Corina Doboș and Alexandru Tofan, “Digital Activism and Women’s Political Participation in Romania,” Social Media + Society 6, no. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969898
[42] Laura Grünberg, “Women’s NGOs in Romania: A Psychological Approach to Post-communism Gender Transformations,” Journal of Psychology and Politics 1, no. 2 (2019): 115-129.
[43] World Health Organization, “Women’s Leadership in the COVID-19 Response: Romania Case Study” (2021). https://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/romania/publications/womens-leadership-in-the-covid-19-response-romania-case-study-2021
Alexandrina Cantacuzino
Alexandrina “Didina” Cantacuzino (née Pallady; also known as Alexandrina Grigore Cantacuzino and (Francized) Alexandrine Cantacuzène; 20 September 1876 – 1944) was a Romanian political activist, philanthropist and diplomat, one of her country’s leading feminists in the 1920s and 1930s. A leader of the National Council of Romanian Women and the Association of Romanian Women, she served as Vice President of the International Council of Women, representing the International Alliance of Women, as well as Romania, to the League of Nations. However, her feminist beliefs and international profile clashed with her national conservatism, her support for eugenics, and eventually her conversion to fascism.
After her involvement with the National Council of Romanian Women, she supported limited women’s suffrage within a corporatist framework, losing the support of liberal women, but also building connections with fascist politicians. Cantacuzino’s policies within the Association of Romanian Women were mirrored in the legislation of World War II fascist regimes, beginning with the National Renaissance Front.
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrina_Cantacuzino